If you don’t support Crooked Hillary you may end up in jail or deported, if she is elected as our 45th president of the United States of America.
In an interview with Chris Wallace today, Hillary claims that every constitutional right American’s have is “open to and even subject to reasonable government regulation.” Really, and who determines what is reasonable?
Could it be the same criminals who used the 9/11 alleged (with emphasis) terrorist incident to usher in the Patriot Act that basically gives the government the right to ignore our 8th amendment right to Due Process of law — the right of the accused to stand trial, any time law enforcement deems a person is a threat to national security.
Does our government law enforcement abuse their power under the Patriot Act? There are numerous cases where our government law enforcement has misused the Patriot Act, most notably new powers granted to law enforcement by the USA PATRIOT Act were used in a corruption case involving a Law Vegas strip club magnate Michael Galardi. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) used the USA PATRIOT Act to obtain financial information about key figures in this ongoing political corruption probe that was in no way related to terrorism (Associated Press, 2003).
Galardi is a convicted criminal and an owner of 20 strip clubs, yet he is protected in the same way as the rest of us from government agencies pursuing criminal charges. In response to the Galardi case, Senator Harry Reid (D-NV), said the USA PATRIOT Act goes too far: “The law was intended for activities related to terrorism and not to naked women … Let me say, with Galardi and his whole gang, I don’t condone, appreciate or support all their nakedness. But having said that, I haven’t heard anyone say at any time he was involved with terrorism” (Associated Press, 2003).
According to Laura Murphy, spokesperson for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU): “The use of the [USA PATRIOT Act] against a sin city vice lord should give pause to anyone who says it has not been abused … The attorney general didn’t tell Congress that he needed the [law] to raid nudie bars” (Associated Press, 2003).
Spokespersons for the Justice Department rarely talk about using the USA PATRIOT Act for non-terrorist crimes, instead choosing to promote the law’s benefits to prevent terrorism. Yet, when asked about the use of the law for non-terrorist criminal matters, members of the Justice Department admit they are using the law this way and they brush aside any legitimate concerns.
Constitutional Rights Brushed Aside to Jail Americans
For example, Justice Department spokesperson Mark Corallo said: “I think any reasonable person would agree that we have an obligation to do everything we can to protect the lives and liberties of Americans from attack, whether it’s from terrorists or garden-variety criminals” (Lichtblau, 2003b, emphasis added). That the USA PATRIOT Act empowers law enforcement agencies to “fight” crime in ways that contradict individual rights granted by the US Constitution is apparently irrelevant.
I am sure that there are many ignorant people who would laud the Justice Department for ‘brushing aside’ the constitutional rights of an alleged mob king running strip clubs and who knows what else, however our constitution rights were never meant to be subject to what any politician deems “reasonable government regulation.”
Please don’t misunderstand my views concerning the provisions of the Patriot Act concerning fighting terrorism, however many of the provisions of the Patriot Act that were allegedly (with emphasis) to be used to fight terrorism, have been ignored since their enactment in 1991—for example, consider the Title IV: Border security provision of said act. Could anyone reasonably argue that we doing more today to protect our borders than we have done in the past?
No, we are not doing more to protect our borders, in fact, they are wide open today for anyone, including terrorists, to cross over into the United States.
And what about other people including a ten year old Caucasian boy, who are not mob bosses and or terrorists that have been subject to law enforcement using the Patriot Act to violate their constitutional rights?
How does and or could Crooked Hillary’s claim that every constitutional right American’s have is “open to and even subject to reasonable government regulation” affect your life?
The answer to that question is highly debatable but only an asinine idiot would ever try to make a case that the FBI and Justice department are not in Hillary’s back pockets. Anyone who could get away with what Crooked Hillary did with her email servers, has definitely got a hell of a lot of power over the two most powerful law enforcement agencies in the US.
Killary has openly admitted her “priority” as president will be to do whatever she wants to with the provisions of the Patriot Act as enforced by the most powerful branches of the federal and state law enforcement, against “anyone [she] thinks may have a possible link to terrorism.”
Please don’t be fooled Americans. If this crazy bitch Hillary Rodham Clinton wins the election, she already has laws in place to use to arrest, detain, deport and or execute anyone she may feel is a ‘treat’ to and or doesn’t support her.
This is Brenda Corpian who is currently looking for a home outside the US, just in case this crazy bitch is ever elected as POTUS, reporting for Get Off The Bs. — Get Off The Bs 7/31/2016