In an article entitled ‘Deceased FBI Agent Found At Trump Tower With Silenced Pistol,’ Brian Michael reported that an armed 62 year old man tried to sneak in to the Trump Tower late Tuesday night. Interestingly the suspect was found with a semi-automatic handgun fitted with a silencer was later identified as Barry Lee Bush, a former Newark NJ FBI agent who allegedly has been dead since 2007.
Kim LaCapria, a so-called content manager writing for Snopes.com, was quick to call Fake News on Brian’s article, however she has offered absolutely nothing of merit to support her allegations.
LaCapria began her ridiculous hit piece by alleging that:
The article contained a whole host of bizarre and difficult to parse claims, beginning with the inclusion of an FBI agent supposedly killed in the line of duty in 2007, suggesting that Bush’s demise was faked and the agent subsequently went deep undercover to work for operatives of the U.S. government or other entities. [wow–Breaking News!]
The New York Times reported on the death of agent Barry Lee Bush in April 2007:
While the circumstances were still under investigation, a statement by the F.B.I. said that the agent, Barry Lee Bush, 52, of the bureau’s Newark office, “may have been fatally wounded as a result of the accidental discharge of another agent’s weapon during a dynamic arrest situation.”
In the 99-year history of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mr. Bush, who was married and the father of two grown children, was the 51st agent killed in the line of duty, and the first to be fatally shot in 10 years. He had worked for the bureau for almost 20 years, in Newark, Kansas City, Mo., and elsewhere.
Brian Michael reported that:
The New York Times reported on April 6, 2007 that Barry Bush, a veteran F.B.I. agent on a bank-robbery detail was fatally wounded apparently when another agent’s weapon accidentally discharged during a confrontation with three gunmen outside a bank in a quiet town in central New Jersey.
Excuse me Kim, you stole our research, referencing the same NY Times article, than summarize the same Times article a little differently, but both your diatribe and Brian’s state that Bush was allegedly killed in April 2007.
Apparently LaCapria’s point is that the FBI says Bush is dead so Brian is obviously wrong. Wake up Kim, is this not the same FBI that just told the whole world that “no prosecutor” could bring a criminal case against Crooked Hillary for her multitude of felony offences in relation to her email server scandal?
Lacapria further alleges and spews on that:
Get Off the BS also framed Trump Tower as if it were the private residence of Donald Trump rather than as a Midtown tourist attraction at which Trump himself is rarely present. If some shadowy figure had really been targeting Trump for a violent attack, he would have been better served making use of the candidate’s campaign schedule (freely available via his social media feeds) rather than breaking into Trump Tower.
If Kim did not have her head in her posterior, she would of discovered the fact that Trump was not at his Mid Town Tower, [Tourist attraction?] on Wednesday evening at 10:00PM when Bush showed up with his silenced CIA issue pistol and silencer, came about from a last minute meeting cancellation.
Additionally, it is well known that Trump often works in his Mid-Town offices as late as 2-3am in the morning.
“Kim Lacapria? Never heard of her Brenda. She certainly never called me,” Trump said.
Lacapria on a roll now, goes on to say that:
The article layered on additional nebulous conspiracy claims, asserting that an FBI page about Bush “went down” after Get Off the BS achieved their big scoop:
According to a spokesman at the Newark FBI field office, Bush was killed in the line of duty in April of 2007. Coincidentally, five minutes after we got off the phone with him, a page honoring FBI agents who were killed in the line of duty, went down on the FBI’s website.
Contrary to those claims, a page memorializing Barry Bush is accessible on the FBI’s web site.
Hey Kim, do you have someone from the FBI’s IT department who will substantiate that when Brian contacted the Newark NJ FBI office at approximately 9:30am on Wednesday morning that the “page honoring FBI agents who were killed in the line of duty” [page is entitled ‘Honor Page’] was online?
Is there more than one page on the FBI site memorializing Barry Bush and other ‘FBI agents’ who were allegedly killed in the line of duty? You don’t have a clue do you?
Finally, Kim ‘Moron’ Lapricia makes the following twos claim, in referencing the Get Off The Bs FAQ, About Us and the original article pages, spewing some more of her unfounded and asininely vetted allegations, stating that:
We contacted the NYPD to ask whether any arrests were made at Trump Tower on 2 August 2016, or if any other recent arrests matched the one reported by Get Off the BS. A public information officer confirmed to us that, despite Get Off the BS’s claim that Barry Bush was arrested and booked by the NYPD on 2 August 2016.
What did happen was that an inebriated security guard with a concealed carry permit (and no ill intent) was briefly taken into custody for intruding into a security area outside Trump Tower
Kim, your statement that “despite Get Off the BS’s claim that Barry Bush was arrested and booked,” like the rest of your moronic ranting is false.
Brian’s article states that, “During his booking at the NYPD Jail, Bush’s fingerprints were submitted to the National Crime Information Center, which immediately reported Bush’s true identity.”
Fingerprinting is in a fact a part of the booking process at all of the NYPD jails, however Brian’s article never claimed that Bush was booked in to any NYPD jail only that he was in fact being finger printed during what is considered a booking process.
Do your research Kim, many suspects are often finger printed to confirm their identities and released prior to the booking process finished. Additionally, if for any reason the intake division of the District Attorney’s office that is an ADA, does not accept charges on a suspect the suspect his released prior to being fully booked.
In fact what Brian did not report was that the CIA and Secret Service met at the Jail and that Bush was led out the door by three CIA officials from the jail. The reason Brian did not report that important issue, is because we have conflicting unconfirmed reports that indicate that the officials who left with Bush were either NSA or CIA. If we were like your rag, we would just called them CIA agents, and most likely would have been correct, as that is the best information we have at this time. Regardless of Brian’s inexperience in reporting, there is nothing in his article that indicates that Barry Bush is confined in a NYPD jail. We simply don’t know enough right now to say where he is at.
Additionally, what the hell did you expect to be told by the NYPD? Yes Kim, we have an FBI agent tucked away in a nasty jail cell, that the FBI and mainstream media claims is dead. Yepper’s Kim, he was packing a loaded Glock with a silencer, straight out of Langley. Yes Kim, we definitely want you and the whole world to know, that the CIA sent an assassin after Donald J. Trump. We release this kind of information every day, especially to you morons at Snopes. Hey Kim, do you know where your bosses our, we still have numerous warrants for their arrest…hello…hello–he hung up.
Kim, if you want a reasonable response to the New York “We have not printed anything true in the last decade’ Daily News article you referenced in your garbage article, please use a source that most New Yorker’s don’t use to wipe their posteriors with when they run out of toilet paper.
Kim, it is stupid bitch hacks like you that have ruined Snopes. At one time, many people use to consider what Snopes reported as the gospel truth. Now, there are over 277,000 complaints posted on the internet about how much garbage your website currently posts. [see below]
Interesting there are no complaints about Get Off The Bs. Google Get Off the BS complaints, if you want to vet that claim.
Snopes is plastered with paid advertising that pays your owners for every person who sees a page on your site with one of more ads. Where is there one paid ad on Get Off The Bs? A site by the way, that on some days smokes your garbage rag on page views.
The most disturbing issue I have with Kim LaCapria, is shown in the picture above. Kim’s falsely claims that through a secret executive order by Obama she started writing for Snopes. She furthers her lie by asking people to share her post if they believe its an egregious example of legislative overreach. It does not take a rocket scientist to realize that the majority of the Snopes audience as well as our own audience, would believe that it was.
What Kim did not include in her whopper of a lie, is that the whole purpose for her telling her lie was to boost her recognition on social media, particularly Facebook and Twitter. She is not a crusading journalist who is trying to expose bogus stories. She is just one of many hacks that is trying to squirm her way into the media spotlight by jumping on viral stories to capture first page Google results linking her comments to pages with Snopes paid advertising and building up her name recognition.
Another issue I have with Kim and Snopes, is her answer to my questioning her allegations that Brian’s article was incorrect. As can be seen in this picture taken from Twitter, Kim basically states that because she knows that Brian’s source for his article is a NYPD officer who does not want to be named, she can pretty much claim whatever she wants.
In Kim’s hit piece she does not source anyone by name. She alleges crap that frankly she just made up. She claims in her Twitter response that since Brian’s article does not offer what she claims is evidence, she can debunk it without evidence. As in the case where Kim claimed that Obama basically approves of her writing for Snopes, Kim really stretched the truth because she knows that very few people could ever get close enough Obama to ask him if he signed a secret executive order in her behalf.
For the record, I wrote a letter to Obama a while back ago that he liked so much, he replied to it. We have written back and forth to each other several times since than. I wrote Obama yesterday morning sharing Kim’s aforementioned claim with him. Obama replied late last night stating the he never heard of Kim LaCapria. Of course Obama’s response did not shock me. The fact is, Kim could claim tomorrow that she was related to and or approved by the Pope of the Catholic Church and frankly only a handful of people could ever debunk it. Obama and the Pope has press agents to answer the media and general public’s questions. If one of those agents working for Obama was to dispute her claim, she would most likely claim that they were misinformed or she would do this to the accuser:
Yes, she blocked me. Why? Because she did not want her audience, those who follow her hear the truth. I have no doubt that if I accused her on her Facebook page, she would block me from there as well.
Finally, as a woman I am very offended by Kim. She is one of many woman who choose to be photographed revealing a lot of cleavage. I really don’t understand that because she does not have above average boobs. In one her public pictures, she is photographed with a slutty expression on her face holding a coffee cup that suggests that she loves to swallow semen. Kim relies on drawing male readers to her prevaricating articles by appearing to be an easy lay. Who knows, maybe she is a slut who will sleep with anybody. I have heard rumors to that affect, but frankly I don’t care how she lives her personal life.
However, when she attacks the integrity of this blog, using the Snopes name, who many still believe is the gospel truth, I take issue with some bimbo spewing unfounded garbage against one of my staff, simply because she can. Kim, you are all the way out in left field and please be advised, I am making it my number one objective to tell the world all about you.
This is Brenda Corpian reporting for Get Off The Bs.